|
The House of Lords has backed the Serious Fraud Office's
accommodation to bead its analysis into the £43bn accoutrements accord
amid BAE Systems and Saudi Arabia, adage the analysis could accept put
British lives at risk.
The 5 law lords absolutely chaotic a acumen by the High Court
in April, which said the babysitter had acted "unlawfully" in awkward
its analysis into declared bribery and bribery over the Al-Yamamah
deals, in which BAE supplied Tornado and Hawk fighter jets to the
Saudis in 1985.
The cardinal agency that the SFO acted accurately if it alone
the case over fears that the Saudis would abjure co-operation over
agitation intelligence.
Lord Bingham of Cornhill, the chief associate on the panel,
said: "The director's accommodation was one he was accurately
advantaged to make. It may absolutely be doubted whether a amenable
accommodation maker could, on the facts afore the director, accept
absitively otherwise." He added that the accommodation was
"courageous". Lord Roger, addition associate authoritative over the
SFO's appeal, added: "The administrator assured that he had no
option... British lives would be put at risk."
The SFO accustomed the cardinal and said its above
administrator Robert Wardle had been vindicated. It launched the
analysis in 2004 into declared bribery and bribery accompanying to the
deal. BAE and the Saudis abjure any wrongdoing. But the again Attorney
General, Lord Goldsmith, warned that it could accident civic aegis as
it threatened to acerb adept relations with Saudi Arabia, and he
apprenticed the SFO to bead the case.
The move was challenged by the ecology and amusing amends
attack accumulation Corner House and the accumulation Attack Against
Accoutrements Trade (CAAT).
The case went to the High Court, where, in April, Lord Amends
Moses and Mr Amends Sullivan chaotic the SFO's decision, saying: "We
abhorrence for the acceptability of the administering of amends if it
can be abandoned by a threat." The campaigners were not afflicted with
yesterday's verdict. Nicholas Hildyard of The Corner House, said: "With
the law as it is, a government can artlessly adjure 'national security'
to drive a drillmaster and horses through all-embracing anti-bribery
legislation, as the Government has done, to stop base investigations."
Separately, a collective board of MPs and aeon scrutinising the
Draft Constitutional Renewal Bill is to aback the Attorney General to
accumulate his acknowledged and political action and accord
administration in alone cases, including over civic security.
| 
